Miller v. OREGON BD. OF PAROLE SUPERVISION

Ninth Circuit

Miller v. OREGON BD. OF PAROLE SUPERVISION

642 F.3d 711

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedFebruary 2, 2011

Docket16-15400

StatusPublished

This text of 642 F.3d 711 (Miller v. OREGON BD. OF PAROLE SUPERVISION) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Miller v. OREGON BD. OF PAROLE SUPERVISION, 642 F.3d 711 (9th Cir. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DOUGLAS RAY MILLER,  Petitioner-Appellant, No. 07-36086 v. D.C. No. OREGON PAROLE BOARD AND POST CV-05-00440- PRISON SUPERVISION,  MWM Respondent-Appellee, District of Oregon, and Portland POST PRISON SUPERVISION, ORDER Respondent.  Filed February 2, 2011

Before: Richard A. Paez and Richard R. Clifton, Circuit Judges, and Larry A. Burns,* District Judge.

ORDER

The Opinion filed on January 18, 2011, and reported at ___ F.3d ___ (9th Cir. 2011), 2011 WL 135041, is hereby with- drawn and vacated.

Within 14 days of the filing of this Order, each party shall submit a letter-brief addressing what effect, if any, the United States Supreme Court decision in Swarthout v. Cooke, 562 U.S. ____ (2011) has on this matter. The letter-briefs shall not exceed five pages.

*The Honorable Larry A. Burns, District Judge for the U.S. District Court for Southern California, San Diego, sitting by designation.

2069 2070 MILLER v. OREGON PAROLE BOARD The court will file a new disposition in due course.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI