Miller v. Oliver
This text of 8 Watts 514 (Miller v. Oliver) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The addition of a basement story to a frame house, finished so far as to have received a family, which seems to have been the case here, is not an erection or a construction within the purview of the statute. Here the frame was lifted up in order to admit of the new story, which shows that it was not within the contemplation of the builder as a part of the original structure, but an addition to a house already occupied, and no part of its finishing.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
8 Watts 514, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miller-v-oliver-pa-1839.