Miller v. Nuckolls

89 S.W. 88, 76 Ark. 485, 1905 Ark. LEXIS 103

• Court: Supreme Court of Arkansas
• Decided: September 30, 1905
• Status: Published

Opinion

McCulloch, J.

This is an action for slander. The plaintiff (appellee) recovered judgment below, and the defendant (appellant) took an appeal to this court. Since the appeal was perfected, the appellant died, and his attorney, as amicus curiae, presents this motion to abate the cause. The appellee responds to the motion, and asks that the cause be revived against the administrator or executor of the deceased.

At common law actions of this kind abated with the death of either party, the wrongdoer or the party injured. “Actio personalis moritur cum persona” was a maxim of the common law. The statute of this State providing for revival of causes of action for wrongs done to the person expressly excepts from its operation actions for slander or libel, thus leaving the common-law rule in force as to those actions. Kirby’s Digest, § 6286. It does not follow, however, that after a verdict and judgment in favor of the plaintiff an action for slander or libel abates. On the contrary, we hold that the cause of action becomes merged in the judgment, and, unless the same be set aside or reversed, there can be no abatement. This view is sustained by authority. Newellon Slander and Libel, p. 375; 21 Enc. of Pl. & Pr. p. 351; Dial v. Holter, 6 Ohio St. 228; Ackers v. Ackers, 16 Lea (Tenn.), 7.

An appeal and supersedeas do not have the effect of vacating a judgment, but only stay proceedings, thereunder. Fowler v. Scott, 11 Ark. 675; 2 Cyc. p. 971; 20 Enc. Pl. & Pr., p. 1240; Runyon v. Bennett, 4 Dana, 599; Low v. Adams, 6 Cal. 277; Martin v. South Salem Land Co., 94 Va. 28; Fawcett v. Superior Court, 15 Wash. 345.

The motion to abate is therefore overruled.