Miller v. Newman

41 Mo. 509
CourtSupreme Court of Missouri
DecidedOctober 15, 1867
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 41 Mo. 509 (Miller v. Newman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Miller v. Newman, 41 Mo. 509 (Mo. 1867).

Opinion

Holmes, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

This was a demand upon an account for services of the plaintiff’s wife before marriage, originally presented for allowance against the estate of James Grahanij deceased, and finally tried in the St. Louis Circuit Court upon appeal from the Probate Court of St. Louis county, and the plaintiff recovered judgment for the sum of $1,8701 The defendant appeals to this court.

The instructions are not objected to. The only errors complained of refer to the ruling of the court in admitting or excluding testimony. It does not appear to us that there was any material error in this action of the court. The matters excluded or admitted were trivial circumstances, or wholly immaterial. There was no such error as would authorize a reversal of the judgment. Nor are the exceptions of sufficient importance to call for a discussion of them in detail. The merits of the case were determined by the verdict, and cannot be re-examined here.

Judgment affirmed.

The other judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ivy v. Yancey
31 S.W. 937 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1895)
MacLeod v. Skiles
81 Mo. 595 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1884)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
41 Mo. 509, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miller-v-newman-mo-1867.