Home/Supreme Court of Louisiana/Miller v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.

Miller v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.

167 So. 2d 668, 246 La. 842, 1964 La. LEXIS 2727
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedOctober 7, 1964
DocketNo. 47394
StatusPublished

This text of 167 So. 2d 668 (Miller v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Miller v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co., 167 So. 2d 668, 246 La. 842, 1964 La. LEXIS 2727 (La. 1964).

Opinion

In re: Marguerite and Jasper Miller applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of Rapides. 164 So.2d 676.

[843]*843Writ refused. The result is correct.

SANDERS, J., is of the opinion that the writ should he granted. See Corkern v. Travelers Ins. Co., 229 La. 592, 86 So.2d 205; Richard v. General Fire & Casualty Co., La.App., 155 So.2d 676; Restatement of Torts (2nd) Section 343 A (Tentative Draft); and Prosser, Law of Torts (3rd ed.) p. 404.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Richard v. General Fire and Casualty Company
155 So. 2d 676 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1963)
Corkern v. Travelers Insurance Co.
86 So. 2d 205 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1956)
Miller v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.
164 So. 2d 676 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1964)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
167 So. 2d 668, 246 La. 842, 1964 La. LEXIS 2727, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miller-v-new-amsterdam-casualty-co-la-1964.