Miller v. Neugold

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Miller v. Neugold

38 A.D.2d 548, 327 N.Y.S.2d 1001, 1971 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2597

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 23, 1971

StatusPublished

This text of 38 A.D.2d 548 (Miller v. Neugold) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Miller v. Neugold, 38 A.D.2d 548, 327 N.Y.S.2d 1001, 1971 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2597 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on May 12, 1971, in favor of the plaintiffs-respondents, unanimously modified, on the law and on the facts, and a new trial granted as to Patricia A. Miller, with costs and disbursements to abide the event, unless plaintiff Patricia A. Miller, within 20 days of service upon her by the defendant-appellant of a copy of this order, with notice of entry thereon, stipulates to accept $30,000 in lieu of the amount awarded her by verdict, in which event the judgment as so reduced and amended, is thus modified, and, as so modified, affirmed without costs and without disbursements. It is our opinion that the amount awarded by the jury to Patricia A. Miller was grossly excessive and that a verdict in excess of the amount indicated is not warranted on this record. Concur — McGivern, J. P., Markewich, Nunez, Kupferman and Eager, JJ. .

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on May 12, 1971, in favor of the plaintiffs-respondents, unanimously modified, on the law and on the facts, and a new trial granted as to Patricia A. Miller, with costs and disbursements to abide the event, unless plaintiff Patricia A. Miller, within 20 days of service upon her by the defendant-appellant of a copy of this order, with notice of entry thereon, stipulates to accept $30,000 in lieu of the amount awarded her by verdict, in which event the judgment as so reduced and amended, is thus modified, and, as so modified, affirmed without costs and without disbursements. It is our opinion that the amount awarded by the jury to Patricia A. Miller was grossly excessive and that a verdict in excess of the amount indicated is not warranted on this record. Concur — McGivern, J. P., Markewich, Nunez, Kupferman and Eager, JJ. .

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

38 A.D.2d 548, 327 N.Y.S.2d 1001, 1971 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2597, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miller-v-neugold-nyappdiv-1971.