Miller v. Naughler Bros. & Travelers Insurance

128 Me. 540
CourtSupreme Judicial Court of Maine
DecidedJuly 1, 1929
StatusPublished

This text of 128 Me. 540 (Miller v. Naughler Bros. & Travelers Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Miller v. Naughler Bros. & Travelers Insurance, 128 Me. 540 (Me. 1929).

Opinion

Workman’s Compensation case. The employer denied that the workman’s injury was caused by accident. This, the only issue before the Commissioner, was decided adversely to the petitioner. The issue was one of fact, and by mandate of the statute the decision of the Com[541]*541missioner is final. There was some testimony in the case tending to prove that the petitioner’s injury was accidental. The Commissioner apparently did not regard this testimony as convincing, and determined as a matter of fact that no accident was proved. No error of law appears. Orff’s case, 122 Me., 114. Appeal dismissed. Decree affirmed.

Ellis Aldrich, for petitioner. Walter F. Bird, Verrill, Hale, Booth # Ives, for respondents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
128 Me. 540, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miller-v-naughler-bros-travelers-insurance-me-1929.