Miller v. Murrah

14 So. 3d 1019, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 5727, 2009 WL 1346158
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 15, 2009
Docket5D08-4101
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 14 So. 3d 1019 (Miller v. Murrah) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Miller v. Murrah, 14 So. 3d 1019, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 5727, 2009 WL 1346158 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner sought habeas corpus release after he was found in civil contempt for failing to pay child support and was ordered to be held in county jail for ninety days, with a purge amount of $2,500. He argued that the trial court failed to make a finding of his present ability to purge the amount; therefore, immediate discharge was mandated. We agreed and ordered his immediate discharge, with this opinion to follow.

Under the facts presented in this case, no written order was rendered beyond a court action form and no finding of present ability to purge was made by the trial judge. Incarceration for civil contempt cannot be imposed absent a finding by the trial court that the contemnor has the present ability to purge himself of the contempt. See Bowen v. Bowen, 471 So.2d 1274 (Fla.1985). We grant the petitioner’s petition for writ of habeas corpus, immediate release having previously been ordered.

PETITION GRANTED.

SAWAYA, ORFINGER and LAWSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Grant v. Kopp
27 So. 3d 190 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
14 So. 3d 1019, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 5727, 2009 WL 1346158, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miller-v-murrah-fladistctapp-2009.