Miller v. Municipal Court of the City of Los Angeles

285 P. 698, 209 Cal. 777, 1930 Cal. LEXIS 551
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 21, 1930
DocketDocket No. L.A. 11926.
StatusPublished

This text of 285 P. 698 (Miller v. Municipal Court of the City of Los Angeles) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Miller v. Municipal Court of the City of Los Angeles, 285 P. 698, 209 Cal. 777, 1930 Cal. LEXIS 551 (Cal. 1930).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM CASES.
THE COURT.

[1] Upon the authority of Hansen v. Municipal Court, 208 Cal. 506 [282 P. 384], and Keaton v. Municipal Court (L.A. No. 11849),ante, p. 52 [285 P. 696], this day decided, we are of the opinion that the peremptory writ of mandate should be issued as prayed for, and it is so ordered. *Page 778

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Keaton v. Mun. Court of L.A.
285 P. 696 (California Supreme Court, 1930)
Hansen v. Municipal Court
282 P. 384 (California Supreme Court, 1929)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
285 P. 698, 209 Cal. 777, 1930 Cal. LEXIS 551, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miller-v-municipal-court-of-the-city-of-los-angeles-cal-1930.