Miller v. Mun. Court of L.A.
209 Cal. 777
This text of 209 Cal. 777 (Miller v. Mun. Court of L.A.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Miller v. Mun. Court of L.A., 209 Cal. 777 (Cal. 1930).
Opinion
— Upon the authority of Hansen v. Municipal Court, 208 Cal. 506 [282 Pac. 384], and Keaton v. Municipal Court (L. A. No. 11849), ante, p. 52 [285 Pac. 696], this day decided, we are of the opinion that the peremptory writ of mandate should be issued as prayed for, and it is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Keaton v. Mun. Court of L.A.
285 P. 696 (California Supreme Court, 1930)
Hansen v. Municipal Court
282 P. 384 (California Supreme Court, 1929)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
209 Cal. 777, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miller-v-mun-court-of-la-cal-1930.