Miller v. Motor Coach Company

16 P.2d 781, 127 Cal. App. 782
California Court of Appeal·Decided November 29, 1932·No. Docket No. 7247.·Published

Opinion

As the result of three actions which arose from allegedly negligent operation of a motor-bus and a private automobile at an intersection of public thoroughfares, consolidated for the purposes of trial, judgments were rendered in favor of the plaintiffs. The defendants presented appeals separately upon the same transcript. The instant appeal is from one of said judgments, entered in favor of a passenger of said automobile.

[1] The questions involved herein are identical with those decided in the case of Harlow v. Motor Coach Co., (Civil No. 7246) ante, p. 728 [16 P.2d 779]. Upon the authority of that case the judgment is affirmed.

Works, P.J., and Stephens, J., pro tem., concurred.

*Page 1

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Miller v. Motor Coach Company, 16 P.2d 781, 127 Cal. App. 782 (Cal. Ct. App. 1932).

16 P.2d 781 (Miller v. Motor Coach Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Harlow v. Motor Coach Co.
16 P.2d 779 (California Court of Appeal, 1932)