Miller v. Morotock Manufacturing Co.
66 S.E. 628, 7 Ga. App. 262, 1909 Ga. App. LEXIS 623
Opinion
On tlie call of the case the plaintiff in error failed to prosecute the writ of error. The defendant in error moved to open the record, and insisted on an affirmance of the judgment and an award of ten per cent, damages for delay, under Rule 22 of this court. The motion of the defendant in error is granted and the judgment is affirmed, with damages. Judgment affirmed with damages.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Miller v. Morotock Manufacturing Co., 66 S.E. 628, 7 Ga. App. 262, 1909 Ga. App. LEXIS 623 (Ga. Ct. App. 1909).
66 S.E. 628 (Miller v. Morotock Manufacturing Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.