Miller v. . Moore

21 S.E.2d 876, 222 N.C. 749, 1942 N.C. LEXIS 125
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided September 30, 1942·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The plaintiff brought this action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained through the alleged negligence of the defendant in the operation of an automobile by his representative and agent.

The Court is unable to find any substantial difference between the evidence in the instant case and that upon which a judgment as of nonsuit was sustained in the case of Smith v. Moore, 220 N. C., 165 — a *750 case growing out of the same accident, to which the plaintiff in that case and the plaintiff in this have identical relation. The judgment of non-suit upon the evidence in this case must be- sustained on that authority.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Miller v. . Moore, 21 S.E.2d 876, 222 N.C. 749, 1942 N.C. LEXIS 125 (N.C. 1942).

21 S.E.2d 876 (Miller v. . Moore) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Carter v. . Motor Lines
41 S.E.2d 586 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1947)
Carter v. Thurston Motor Lines, Inc.
227 N.C. 193 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1947)