Home/Supreme Court of Iowa/Miller v. Monona County

Miller v. Monona County

294 N.W. 308, 229 Iowa 165
CourtSupreme Court of Iowa
DecidedOctober 15, 1940
DocketNo. 45348.
StatusPublished
Cited by11 cases

This text of 294 N.W. 308 (Miller v. Monona County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Iowa primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Miller v. Monona County, 294 N.W. 308, 229 Iowa 165 (iowa 1940).

Opinion

Sager, J.

For convenience, the Haitz district will be referred to as if it were the only defendant, the others not having appealed.

Following an unsuccessful attempt to establish a drainage district in the same territory, Haitz district was completed in 1915. The proceedings by which this was accomplished were not challenged then and are not now. To aid in an understanding of the general plan of the project, we attach a plat of the district. It will be observed that the main ditch runs in a generally north and south direction. The engineer’s plan provided for the construction of laterals extending westward with their outlets in the main ditch. Laterals were constructed every mile with the waste bank on the south side. There being no openings in these banks, the effect, as was the purpose of the plan, was that the surface water on each mile was to be taken care of by the lateral south of it. We are concerned here only with lateral No. 8. As originally planned and constructed there were no openings in its waste bank. It extended westward to the point indicated on the plat. In proceedings had in 1930 this was extended to the West Fork ditch, the extension being that part appearing in the plat as “Private Dyke”. This designation “Private” ivas an error but not important here.

*167

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

John and Lauri Askew v. Trustees of Mule Slough Drainage District
Court of Appeals of Iowa, 2020
Board of Water Works Trustees of the City of Des Moines, Iowa v. Sac County Board of Supervisors, as Trustee of Drainage Districts 32, 42, 65, 79, 81, 83, 86, and Calhoun County Board of Supervisors and Sac County Board of Supervisors as Joint Trustees of Drainage Districts 2 and 51 and Buena Vista County Board of Supervisors and Sac County Board of Supervisors as Joint Trustees of Drainage Districts 19
890 N.W.2d 50 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 2017)
Amended April 11, 2017 Board of Water Works Trustees of the City of Des Moines, Iowa v. Sac County Board of Supervisors, as Trustee of Drainage Districts 32, 42, 65, 79, 81, 83, 86, and Calhoun County Board of Supervisors and Sac County Board of Supervisors as Joint Trustees of Drainage Districts 2 and 51 and Buena Vista County Board of Supervisors and Sac County Board of Supervisors as Joint Trustees
Supreme Court of Iowa, 2017
Gannon v. Rumbaugh
772 N.W.2d 258 (Court of Appeals of Iowa, 2009)
Sedore v. TRUSTEES OF STREEBY DRAINAGE
525 N.W.2d 432 (Court of Appeals of Iowa, 1994)
Reed v. Muscatine—Louisa Drainage District 13
263 N.W.2d 548 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1978)
Droegmiller v. Olson
40 N.W.2d 292 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1949)
Coe v. Board of Supervisors
295 N.W. 151 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1940)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
294 N.W. 308, 229 Iowa 165, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miller-v-monona-county-iowa-1940.