Miller v. Missouri Department of Corrections

Missouri Court of Appeals

Miller v. Missouri Department of Corrections

212 S.W.3d 163, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1786, 2006 WL 3407789

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedNovember 28, 2006

DocketWD 65842

StatusPublished

This text of 212 S.W.3d 163 (Miller v. Missouri Department of Corrections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Miller v. Missouri Department of Corrections, 212 S.W.3d 163, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1786, 2006 WL 3407789 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

Order

PER CURIAM.

The Department of Corrections appeals the motion court’s grant of a declaratory judgment stating that Scott Miller’s prior 120-day callback did not count as a prior commitment for the purpose of determining his mandatory minimum sentence under section 558.019. The Department’s main contention is that section 559.115.7 should not apply retroactively. Having carefully considered the contentions on appeal, we find no grounds for reversing the decision. Publication of a formal opinion would not serve jurisprudential purposes or add to understanding of existing law. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order

PER CURIAM.

The Department of Corrections appeals the motion court’s grant of a declaratory judgment stating that Scott Miller’s prior 120-day callback did not count as a prior commitment for the purpose of determining his mandatory minimum sentence under section 558.019. The Department’s main contention is that section 559.115.7 should not apply retroactively. Having carefully considered the contentions on appeal, we find no grounds for reversing the decision. Publication of a formal opinion would not serve jurisprudential purposes or add to understanding of existing law. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

212 S.W.3d 163, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1786, 2006 WL 3407789, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miller-v-missouri-department-of-corrections-moctapp-2006.