Miller v. Miller
424 A.2d 549, 276 Pa. Super. 639
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Miller v. Miller. Read the opinion of the Court — 269 Pa. Super. 83 →
Opinion
Appellant contends that the doctrine of inter spousal immunity should not prevent her from suing her husband for personal injuries and property damage arising out of an automobile accident. We disagree and find our supreme court’s decision in the case of DiGirolamo v. Apanavage, 454 Pa. 557, 312 A.2d 382 (1973) to be dispositive of the instant appeal.
Accordingly, the order of the court of common pleas is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Miller v. Miller, 424 A.2d 549, 276 Pa. Super. 639 (Pa. Ct. App. 1979).
424 A.2d 549 (Miller v. Miller) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
DiGIROLAMO v. Apanavage
312 A.2d 382 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1973)