Miller v. Miller
This text of 103 P.2d 737 (Miller v. Miller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The plaintiff first married the defendant on June 9,1918, and about one year thereafter a daughter, now 21 years of age, was born. A short time after the birth of the daughter, plaintiff brought suit and obtained a divorce from defendant and a few months thereafter they remarried. Plaintiff is now suing for divorce upon the ground of cruel and inhuman treatment.
The cause was tried in the circuit court for Multnomah county before the Honorable Clarence H. Gilbert, Judge pro tern, and, after a consideration of all the *39 evidence, he held that both parties were at fault and that plaintiff was not entitled to a decree of divorce.
We also have carefully considered the testimony and are of the opinion that plaintiff has wholly failed to establish the charges alleged in her complaint. We also are of the opinion that the controversies and disputes between these parties are as much the fault of the plaintiff as of the defendant and that neither party is entitled to a divorce.
The decree appealed from will, therefore, be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
103 P.2d 737, 165 Or. 38, 1940 Ore. LEXIS 6, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miller-v-miller-or-1940.