Miller v. Miller

131 P. 308, 65 Or. 551, 1913 Ore. LEXIS 294
Oregon Supreme Court·Decided April 8, 1913·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinions

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice McBride.

1. There is some question raised as to the relevancy of the original complaint, answer and reply as a part of the transcript. They are necessary and proper to the determination of this case.

2. The Circuit Court has no jurisdiction to grant a divorce without hearing testimony, and the whole decree is absolutely void.

The cause will be remanded to the Circuit Court with instructions to vacate the original decree, to hear the testimony, and to make a decree in accordance therewith. Neither party will recover costs in this court. Remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Miller v. Miller, 131 P. 308, 65 Or. 551, 1913 Ore. LEXIS 294 (Or. 1913).

131 P. 308 (Miller v. Miller) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Garner v. Garner
189 P.2d 397 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1948)
Kline v. Murray
257 P. 465 (Montana Supreme Court, 1927)
Romero v. McIntosh
19 N.M. 612 (New Mexico Supreme Court, 1914)