Miller v. Miller

2021 NY Slip Op 02724
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Miller v. Miller. Read the opinion of the Court — 189 N.Y.S.3d 732
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 30, 2021·No. MOTION NO. (761/20) CA 20-00203.·Published

Opinion

Miller v Miller (2021 NY Slip Op 02724)
Miller v Miller
2021 NY Slip Op 02724
Decided on April 30, 2021
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on April 30, 2021
PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., CENTRA, PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, AND BANNISTER, JJ. (Filed Apr. 30, 2021.)
MOTION NO. (761/20) CA 20-00203.

[*1]SHEILA (BAILEY) MILLER, AS ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF THOMAS J. MILLER, DECEASED, AND SHEILA (BAILEY) MILLER, INDIVIDUALLY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT-APPELLANT,

v

PATRICIA A. MILLER, AS EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF MARK MENDY, DECEASED, DEFENDANT, AND MOOG, INC., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT-RESPONDENT.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Motion for reargument denied.



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Miller v. Miller, 2021 NY Slip Op 02724 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2021).

2021 NY Slip Op 02724 (Miller v. Miller) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 431
New York JUD § 431