Miller v. Miller

254 A.D. 586, 3 N.Y.S.2d 36, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6665
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 25, 1938
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 254 A.D. 586 (Miller v. Miller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Miller v. Miller, 254 A.D. 586, 3 N.Y.S.2d 36, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6665 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

Opinion

In an action in tort it appears that the plaintiff is the wife of the defendant’s son. The latter’s conduct was such that the plaintiff brought an action for separation against him. Both the defendant and the son are lawyers. During the progress of the separation action it is alleged that the defendant, by many dilatory motions and otherwise, [587]*587intermeddled with the family relation and sought by all means to prevent the support of the wife and her two children by her husband. Shortly before the final judgment of separation was obtained it is alleged that the defendant induced the son to leave the jurisdiction of the courts of this State and reside elsewhere for the purpose of mating the judgment ineffective and unenforeible as far as support was concerned, and apparently furnished financial means to the husband, for he was admittedly without resources of his own — all this, it is alleged, with a willful and malicious purpose to accomplish a perversion of justice, amounting to a conspiracy between the father and son to prevent the latter from performing or attempting to perform the duty that the law easts upon him. Order denying defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, with leave to defendant to answer within ten days from the entry of the order hereon. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Davis, Johnston and Taylor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

MC GRADY v. Rosenbaum
62 Misc. 2d 182 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1970)
Holland v. Holland
11 A.D.2d 736 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1960)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
254 A.D. 586, 3 N.Y.S.2d 36, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6665, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miller-v-miller-nyappdiv-1938.