Miller v. Miller
47 A.2d 32, 138 N.J. Eq. 225
Opinion
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Yice-Chancellor Bigelow filed in the Court of Chancery.
For affirmance■ — The Chiee-Justice, Paekee, Bodine, Donges, Hei-iee, Perskie, Oliphant, Wells, Raeeerty, Dill, McGeehah, JJ. 11.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Miller v. Miller, 47 A.2d 32, 138 N.J. Eq. 225 (N.J. 1946).
47 A.2d 32 (Miller v. Miller) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In Re Estate of Holcomb
2002 OK 90 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 2002)
Petruccio v. Petruccio
501 A.2d 593 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1985)
Eisenberg v. Finston
87 A.2d 448 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1952)
Brooklyn Trust Co. v. Podvin
82 A.2d 485 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1951)
Capozzi v. Capozzi
64 A.2d 433 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1949)
Blake v. Brennan
61 A.2d 916 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1948)