Miller v. Miller

210 S.E.2d 438, 24 N.C. App. 319, 1974 N.C. App. LEXIS 1993
Court of Appeals of North Carolina·Decided December 18, 1974·No. 7410DC512·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

BROCK, Chief Judge.

Rule 55 (d) of the North Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure provides that

“[f]or good cause shown the court may set aside an entry of default, and, if a judgment by default has been entered, the judge may set it aside in accordance with rule 60(b).” (Emphasis added.)

It is well settled that an entry of default is to be distinguished from a judgment by default. Whaley v. Rhodes, 10 N.C. *321 App. 109, 177 S.E. 2d 735. An entry of default is made by the clerk of court and has been characterized as a “ministerial duty.” See 2 McIntosh, N. C. Practice 2d, § 1668 (Supp. 1970). Courts generally favor giving every litigant a fair opportunity to present his side of a disputed controversy.

We have repeatedly held that a determination of the existence of good cause under Rule 55(d) rests in the sound discretion of the trial judge. His ruling will not be disturbed unless a clear abuse of discretion is shown. Whaley v. Rhodes, supra; Hubbard v. Lumley, 17 N.C. App. 649, 195 S.E. 2d 330; Acceptance Corp. v. Samuels, 11 N.C. App. 504, 181 S.E. 2d 794. We find no abuse of discretion in the ruling questioned by plaintiff.

Affirmed.

Judges Parker and Martin concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Miller v. Miller, 210 S.E.2d 438, 24 N.C. App. 319, 1974 N.C. App. LEXIS 1993 (N.C. Ct. App. 1974).

210 S.E.2d 438 (Miller v. Miller) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

EB HARRIS, INC. v. Wiggins
692 S.E.2d 891 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2010)
Deutsche Bank Trust Co. Ams. v. Tradewinds Airlines, Inc.
2009 NCBC 12 (North Carolina Business Court, 2009)
Pryse v. Strickland Lumber & Building Supply, Inc.
311 S.E.2d 598 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1984)
Hasty v. Carpenter
276 S.E.2d 513 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1981)
Peebles v. Moore
269 S.E.2d 694 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1980)
Bailey v. Gooding
263 S.E.2d 634 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1980)