Miller v. Miller

10 N.E.2d 746, 104 Ind. App. 298, 1937 Ind. App. LEXIS 47
CourtIndiana Court of Appeals
DecidedNovember 4, 1937
DocketNo. 15,597.
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 10 N.E.2d 746 (Miller v. Miller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Miller v. Miller, 10 N.E.2d 746, 104 Ind. App. 298, 1937 Ind. App. LEXIS 47 (Ind. Ct. App. 1937).

Opinion

Dudine, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment for plaintiff in an action instituted by appellee against appellant for the possession of certain real estate and damages for unlawful detention thereof.

The issues were formed by a complaint in one paragraph and an answer in general denial. The cause was submitted to The court for trial without a jury, and the court found for the plaintiff and rendered judgment accordingly.

The errors assigned on appeal are: 1, alleged error in overruling a demurrer to the complaint, which demurrer was filed by appellant; 2, alleged error in overruling a motion for new trial, which motion was filed by appellant.

*299 *298 Under the heading “Points and Authorities” in appellant’s brief is a statement of the two errors assigned, *299 including a statement of the causes for new trial set forth in the motion therefor. Following that is a statement of eleven points or propositions, numbered consecutively, without any reference to any of the assigned errors or causes for new trial and without any application of said points or authorities thereto.

This is not a substantial compliance with the rules of this court, particularly Rule twenty-one, Clause sixth (Now Rule eighteen, clause sixth) which provides that: “Each of the . . . assignments shall be separately considered by separately numbered propositions ...”

That rule provides further “Assigned errors not treated as herein directed shall be deemed waived.” (Our italics.)

The rules of this court are binding upon this court as well as upon the litigants, and therefore we deem all assigned errors waived.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Guthrie v. BLAKELY
130 N.E.2d 62 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1955)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
10 N.E.2d 746, 104 Ind. App. 298, 1937 Ind. App. LEXIS 47, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miller-v-miller-indctapp-1937.