Miller v. Miller

96 So. 2d 538, 1957 Fla. LEXIS 3573
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided July 31, 1957·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause came on to he heard on the motion of appellee to affirm the judgment appealed from pursuant to Rule 38 of the Rules of this Court, 31 F.S.A., and it appearing to the court from an examination of the record that said motion is appropriate and seasonably made and that it is manifest that the questions raised on appeal are without substantial merit and need no further argument;

It is accordingly Ordered, Adjudged and Decreed that the motion to affirm the judgment appealed from he, and the same is,, hereby granted, and the judgment is

Affirmed.

HOBSON, Acting C. J., and DREW, THORNAL and O’CONNELL, JJ., and CARROLL, District Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Miller v. Miller, 96 So. 2d 538, 1957 Fla. LEXIS 3573 (Fla. 1957).

96 So. 2d 538 (Miller v. Miller) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Enfinger v. Baxley
96 So. 2d 538 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1957)