Miller v. Miller

96 So. 2d 538, 1957 Fla. LEXIS 3573
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedJuly 31, 1957
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 96 So. 2d 538 (Miller v. Miller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Miller v. Miller, 96 So. 2d 538, 1957 Fla. LEXIS 3573 (Fla. 1957).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause came on to he heard on the motion of appellee to affirm the judgment appealed from pursuant to Rule 38 of the Rules of this Court, 31 F.S.A., and it appearing to the court from an examination of the record that said motion is appropriate and seasonably made and that it is manifest that the questions raised on appeal are without substantial merit and need no further argument;

It is accordingly Ordered, Adjudged and Decreed that the motion to affirm the judgment appealed from he, and the same is,, hereby granted, and the judgment is

Affirmed.

HOBSON, Acting C. J., and DREW, THORNAL and O’CONNELL, JJ., and CARROLL, District Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Enfinger v. Baxley
96 So. 2d 538 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1957)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
96 So. 2d 538, 1957 Fla. LEXIS 3573, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miller-v-miller-fla-1957.