Miller v. Miller

Supreme Court of Florida

Miller v. Miller

189 So. 927, 138 Fla. 329, 1939 Fla. LEXIS 1407

DecidedMay 30, 1939

StatusPublished

This text of 189 So. 927 (Miller v. Miller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Miller v. Miller, 189 So. 927, 138 Fla. 329, 1939 Fla. LEXIS 1407 (Fla. 1939).

Pincite

Opinion

Pee Curiam. —

Upon petition requesting that the scope of the decree of this Court rendered herein October 31, 1938, be more definitely stated, it is upon consideration ordered that, as is manifest from the opinion of this Court; the decree rendered here is intended to apply only to the petition in the cause filed November 20, 1936, and such decree of this Court should be regarded as decreeing that the order appealed from which denied the petition for permission to file a “petition in the nature of a bill of review” filed November 20, 1936, is reversed and the cause remanded for appropriate proceedings on such petition.

It is so ordered.

Terrell, C. J., and Whitfield, Brown, Buford and Ci-iapman, J. J., concur. Justice Ti-iomas not participating as authorized by Section 4687, Compiled General Laws of 1927, and Rule 21-A of the Rules of this Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee Curiam. —

Upon petition requesting that the scope of the decree of this Court rendered herein October 31, 1938, be more definitely stated, it is upon consideration ordered that, as is manifest from the opinion of this Court; the decree rendered here is intended to apply only to the petition in the cause filed November 20, 1936, and such decree of this Court should be regarded as decreeing that the order appealed from which denied the petition for permission to file a “petition in the nature of a bill of review” filed November 20, 1936, is reversed and the cause remanded for appropriate proceedings on such petition.

It is so ordered.

Terrell, C. J., and Whitfield, Brown, Buford and Ci-iapman, J. J., concur. Justice Ti-iomas not participating as authorized by Section 4687, Compiled General Laws of 1927, and Rule 21-A of the Rules of this Court.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

189 So. 927, 138 Fla. 329, 1939 Fla. LEXIS 1407, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miller-v-miller-fla-1939.