Miller v. Metropolitan Dade County

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Miller v. Metropolitan Dade County

386 So. 2d 1248, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 17470

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 22, 1980

DocketNo. 79-2339

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 386 So. 2d 1248 (Miller v. Metropolitan Dade County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Miller v. Metropolitan Dade County, 386 So. 2d 1248, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 17470 (Fla. Ct. App. 1980).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In entering summary judgment below, the trial court held that Dade County was required to make social security (FICA) deductions from salary payments made to its employees during their absence from work because of sickness. For the reasons outlined in State of New Mexico v. Weinberger, 517 F.2d 989 (10th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1051, 96 S.Ct. 779, 46 L.Ed.2d 640 (1976) and Graves v. Gardner, 280 F.Supp. 666 (S.D.N.Y.1968), we agree with that conclusion.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In entering summary judgment below, the trial court held that Dade County was required to make social security (FICA) deductions from salary payments made to its employees during their absence from work because of sickness. For the reasons outlined in State of New Mexico v. Weinberger, 517 F.2d 989 (10th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1051, 96 S.Ct. 779, 46 L.Ed.2d 640 (1976) and Graves v. Gardner, 280 F.Supp. 666 (S.D.N.Y.1968), we agree with that conclusion.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

386 So. 2d 1248, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 17470, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miller-v-metropolitan-dade-county-fladistctapp-1980.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack