Miller v. McKenzie
77 U.S. 582, 19 L. Ed. 1043, 10 Wall. 582, 1870 U.S. LEXIS 1155
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
It appears, from an inspection of the record, that the writ of error is defective in respect to the parties. It is therein recited that the proceedings are between Pitzer Miller and Larkin McKenzie, and others. This defect has been held so many -times in this court as fatal to its jurisdiction that it need be but mentioned to require a dismissal of the case.
Motion granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Miller v. McKenzie, 77 U.S. 582, 19 L. Ed. 1043, 10 Wall. 582, 1870 U.S. LEXIS 1155 (1871).
77 U.S. 582 (Miller v. McKenzie) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State ex rel. Andreu v. Canfield
40 Fla. 36 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1898)
Walton v. Marietta Chair Co.
157 U.S. 342 (Supreme Court, 1895)
Bellinger v. Thompson
37 P. 714 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1894)
Bowler v. McIntyre
9 Haw. 306 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1893)
Estis v. Trabue
128 U.S. 225 (Supreme Court, 1888)