Miller v. McKean

Indiana Court of Appeals

Miller v. McKean

78 N.E. 1049, 38 Ind. App. 695, 1906 Ind. App. LEXIS 252

CourtIndiana Court of Appeals

DecidedOctober 26, 1906

DocketNo. 5,840

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 78 N.E. 1049 (Miller v. McKean) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Miller v. McKean, 78 N.E. 1049, 38 Ind. App. 695, 1906 Ind. App. LEXIS 252 (Ind. Ct. App. 1906).

Pincite

Opinion

Black, J.

The appellant sued to recover of the appellee George E. McKean contribution because of the payment by the appellant of certain alleged debts of these parties, and to set aside a conveyance of real estate made by said McKean to defraud his creditors. Upon the trial of issues [696]*696formed there was a general finding “for the defendants.” The only judgment shown by the record was entered as follows: “It is therefore considered and adjudged by the court that the plaintiff pay the costs herein paid, laid out, and expended.” This is not a final judgment from which an- appeal will lie.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Black, J.

The appellant sued to recover of the appellee George E. McKean contribution because of the payment by the appellant of certain alleged debts of these parties, and to set aside a conveyance of real estate made by said McKean to defraud his creditors. Upon the trial of issues [696]*696formed there was a general finding “for the defendants.” The only judgment shown by the record was entered as follows: “It is therefore considered and adjudged by the court that the plaintiff pay the costs herein paid, laid out, and expended.” This is not a final judgment from which an- appeal will lie.

Appeal dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

78 N.E. 1049, 38 Ind. App. 695, 1906 Ind. App. LEXIS 252, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miller-v-mckean-indctapp-1906.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack