Miller v. Maxwell
This text of 261 P. 1116 (Miller v. Maxwell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Colorado primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
Miller had judgment against Maxwell on a dishonored check before justice of the peace. On appeal both sides moved for a directed verdict and the court directed for the defendant. The plaintiff brings error.
- The evidence shows that Miller was mortgagee of an apartment house, Maxwell was the agent of the owner and mortgagor. Maxwell gave Miller’s agents the check in question which they credited on account of interest on the mortgage note and when it was dishonored Miller brought this action.
There was evidence which some circumstances tended to corroborate, that when Maxwell left the check with Miller’s agents he said it was left in payment of interest *541 upon the obligation to Miller “provided I made the collections to pay it, ’ ’ and that he never was able to make the collections. If the court believed this the judgment was right. C. L. § 3833; Sayre v. Leonard, 57 Colo. 118, 140 Pac. 196.
Judgment affirmed.
Me. Chiee Justice Burke, Mr. Justice Whiteord and Mr. Justice Sheaeor concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
261 P. 1116, 82 Colo. 540, 1927 Colo. LEXIS 501, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miller-v-maxwell-colo-1927.