Miller v. Mather

5 How. Pr. 160
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 15, 1850
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 5 How. Pr. 160 (Miller v. Mather) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Miller v. Mather, 5 How. Pr. 160 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1850).

Opinion

Edmonds; Justice.

The objection to the discovery sought in this case is that an issue is not joined. I can discover nothing in the Code which confines the discovery within the limits claimed.

On the other hand, the discovery here sought is a substitute for the former bill of discovery in equity in aid of an action at law and such bill might be filed at any time after the action at law was commenced, and indeed in certain cases, namely, where the discovery sought was in reference to whom ought to be parties, even before suit brought.

It would be clearly improper to limit the discovery under the present beyond what it was under the old law, unless the statute plainly required it.

The order for a discovery must therefore be enforced.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Thompson v. Erie Railway Co.
9 Abb. Pr. 230 (New York Supreme Court, 1870)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
5 How. Pr. 160, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miller-v-mather-nysupct-1850.