Miller v. Liberty National Bank Trust Company

24 S.E.2d 415, 68 Ga. App. 834, 1943 Ga. App. LEXIS 374
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided February 17, 1943·No. 29793.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

It is well settled by repeated decisions of the Supreme Court and this court that the striking of a defendant's answer is not a final judgment, and that where the only assignment of error in a bill of exceptions is on the striking of the answer this court is without jurisdiction to entertain the bill of exceptions. This is true even where the bill of exceptions contains a recital that the case proceeded to a judgment in favor of the plaintiff. McCranie v. Shipp, 10 Ga. App. 544 (73 S.E. 701); Cheney v. Corbitt Motor-Truck Co., 36 Ga. App. 590 (137 S.E. 412); Willis v. Daniel, 39 Ga. App. 670 (148 S.E. 301). Applying this ruling to the facts of the instant case, the writ of error must be

Dismissed. MacIntyre and Gardner, JJ.,concur.

DECIDED FEBRUARY 17, 1943. *Page 835

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Miller v. Liberty National Bank Trust Company, 24 S.E.2d 415, 68 Ga. App. 834, 1943 Ga. App. LEXIS 374 (Ga. Ct. App. 1943).

24 S.E.2d 415 (Miller v. Liberty National Bank Trust Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Duncan v. Bradshaw
105 S.E.2d 385 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1958)