Miller v. Liberty National Bank & Trust Co.

68 Ga. App. 834
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided February 17, 1943·No. 29793·Published

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

It is well settled by repeated decisions of the Supreme Court and this court that the striking of a defendant’s answer is not a final judgment, and that where the only assignment of error in a bill of exceptions is on the striking of the answer this court is without jurisdiction to entertain the bill of exceptions. This is true even where the bill of exceptions contains a recital that the case proceeded to a judgment in favor of the plaintiff. McCranie v. Shipp, 10 Ga. App. 544 (73 S. E. 701) ; Cheney v. Corbitt Motor-Truck, Co., 36 Ga. App. 590 (137 S. E. 412); Willis v. Daniel, 39 Ga. App. 670 (148 S. E. 301). Applying this ruling to the facts of the instant case, the writ of error must be

Dismissed.

MacIntyre and Gardner, JJ., concur. R. T. Dutton, for plaintiff in error. A. A. Baumstark, Paul Ginsberg, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Miller v. Liberty National Bank & Trust Co., 68 Ga. App. 834 (Ga. Ct. App. 1943).

68 Ga. App. 834 (Miller v. Liberty National Bank & Trust Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Guardian v. Shipp
73 S.E. 701 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1912)
Cheney v. Corbitt Motor-Truck Co.
137 S.E. 412 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1927)
Willis v. Daniel
148 S.E. 301 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1929)