Miller v. Lefever

10 Neb. 77
CourtNebraska Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 15, 1880
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 10 Neb. 77 (Miller v. Lefever) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Miller v. Lefever, 10 Neb. 77 (Neb. 1880).

Opinion

Lake, J.

This ease concerns a sale of real estate under a decree of foreclosure. A motion was made in the court below to set the sale aside, chiefly for the reason that the required thirty days’ notice thereof was not given.

In the sheriff’s return to the order of sale it is certified that “ on the fifth day of March, a.d. 1879, I caused a notice to be published in the Nebraska Herald * * * that I would offer said real estate for sale,” etc. This seems to imply that the notice was actually published on-that day, which, had it been, would have answered the requirement of the statute in that particular.

But this certificate cannot he taken as proof of when the notice was in fact first published. Sec. 403 [78]*78of the code of civil procedure provides that “ publications required by law to be made in a newspaper may be proved by affidavit of any person having knowledge of the fact, specifying the time when, and the paper in which, the publication was made,” etc. And pursuant to this provision of the statute, proof was made by the affidavit of R. 0. Fellows, then the foreman of the Herald office, from whence the publication in question was made. This affidavit shows the notice to have been first published on the sixth of March, thus giving but twenty-nine days before the day of sale, which was fixed for the fifth of April, 1879. The notice of sale not having been published thirty days before the day of sale the order of confirmation must be set aside, the sale vacated, and the sheriff directed to proceed to advertise and sell the mortgaged premises, as provided in the decree and order of the district court, and to make return to that court of his proceedings for confirmation.

Judgment accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Young v. Figg
107 N.W. 788 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1906)
Magney v. Roberts
105 N.W. 430 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1905)
Holmes v. Crooks
76 N.W. 1073 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1898)
Johnson v. Colby
72 N.W. 313 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1897)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
10 Neb. 77, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miller-v-lefever-neb-1880.