Miller v. Layne
This text of 391 S.W.2d 701 (Miller v. Layne) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This suit was brought by plaintiff, a resident, property owner and taxpayer of Jefferson County, against defendant Tax Commissioner of Jefferson County to have the defendant removed from office for misfeasance under the provisions of KRS 132.370 (3). A motion to dismiss the complaint was sustained on the ground that defendant in assessing property in Jefferson County was not acting in an unlawful manner.
This appeal was heard with the appeals in Russman et al. v. Luckett et al., Ky., 391 S.W.2d 694, and McDevitt et al. v. Luckett et al., Ky., 694 S.W.2d 700. We have this day handed down an opinion in Russ-man et al. v. Luckett et al., which disposes of the basic question here involved and that opinion is incorporated herein by reference.
As pointed out in that opinion, the defendant and other public officials have violated the law but the extreme circumstances are such that the defendant should not be penalized at this time for acts which conformed to a long prevailing, though illegal custom. As of January 1, 1966, strict compliance with the law will be required.
Though the trial court rendered its decision on an erroneous ground, for the reasons stated in Russman et al. v. Luckett et al., the complaint was properly dismissed. It may be observed that this dismissal does not foreclose the plaintiff’s right to initiate a similar proceeding after January 1, 1966.
The judgment is affirmed.'
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
391 S.W.2d 701, 1965 Ky. LEXIS 324, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miller-v-layne-kyctapp-1965.