Miller v. Langston

756 S.W.2d 455, 296 Ark. 302, 1988 Ark. LEXIS 370
Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided September 12, 1988·No. CR 88-52·Published

Opinions

Per Curiam.

Petitioner seeks a writ of prohibition upon allegations that the state has violated his right to a speedy trial by failing to try him within twelve months of his arrest on charges of possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver, possession of drug paraphernalia, and with being an habitual criminal, CR-87-239, Circuit Court of Sebastian County, Arkansas, Ft. Smith District. The case is presented upon a stipulation of facts. The stipulation contains nothing concerning a trial date, but from the briefs it appears the petitioner may have been tried on these charges on April 19, 1988.

The parties are directed to submit a joint pleading or stipulation, to be filed with our Clerk advising whether petitioner has in fact been tried on these charges.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Purtle, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Miller v. Langston, 756 S.W.2d 455, 296 Ark. 302, 1988 Ark. LEXIS 370 (Ark. 1988).

756 S.W.2d 455 (Miller v. Langston) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.