MILLER v. KIJAKAZI

E.D. Pennsylvania

MILLER v. KIJAKAZI

DecidedJune 29, 2020

Docket2:19-cv-05218

StatusUnknown

This text of MILLER v. KIJAKAZI (MILLER v. KIJAKAZI) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

MILLER v. KIJAKAZI, (E.D. Pa. 2020).

Pincite

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

TAMMY LYN MILLER, : Plaintiff, : : v. : CIVIL ACTION NO. 19-CV-5218 : ANDREW M. SAUL, : Commissioner of Social Security : Defendant. : O R D E R AND NOW this 29th day of June, 2020, upon consideration of the parties’ submissions, it is ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff’s Request for Review (Doc. No. 13) is GRANTED, and the matter is REMANDED in accordance with the fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) to the Commissioner of Social Security for further proceedings; 2. JUDGMENT IS ENTERED by separate document, filed contemporaneously. See Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292, 303 (1993); Kadelski v. Sullivan, 30 F.3d 399, 402 (3d Cir. 1994); Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a). 3. The Clerk of Court shall mark this case CLOSED for all purposes including statistics.

_s/ Richard A. Lloret ________ RICHARD A. LLORET U.S. Magistrate Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

TAMMY LYN MILLER, : Plaintiff, : : v. : CIVIL ACTION NO. 19-CV-5218 : ANDREW M. SAUL, : Commissioner of Social Security : Defendant. : O R D E R AND NOW this 29th day of June, 2020, upon consideration of the parties’ submissions, it is ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff’s Request for Review (Doc. No. 13) is GRANTED, and the matter is REMANDED in accordance with the fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) to the Commissioner of Social Security for further proceedings; 2. JUDGMENT IS ENTERED by separate document, filed contemporaneously. See Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292, 303 (1993); Kadelski v. Sullivan, 30 F.3d 399, 402 (3d Cir. 1994); Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a). 3. The Clerk of Court shall mark this case CLOSED for all purposes including statistics.

_s/ Richard A. Lloret ________ RICHARD A. LLORET U.S. Magistrate Judge

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

MILLER v. KIJAKAZI, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miller-v-kijakazi-paed-2020.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack