Miller v. Kent
18 F. 561, 20 Blatchf. 508, 1882 U.S. App. LEXIS 2235
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York·Decided May 17, 1882·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
In the absence of any explanation of the delay in moving to remand this action, it should be determined that, by the delay of over a year since the cause was removed to this court, before making this motion to remand, the plaintiff has lost his right to insist that the petition for removal was not filed in time.
Motion denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Miller v. Kent, 18 F. 561, 20 Blatchf. 508, 1882 U.S. App. LEXIS 2235 (circtsdny 1882).
18 F. 561 (Miller v. Kent) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
O. W. Weeks v. The Fidelity and Casualty Company of New York
218 F.2d 503 (Fifth Circuit, 1955)