Miller v. Johnson

Supreme Court

Miller v. Johnson

512 U.S. 1283

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedSeptember 23, 1994

DocketNo. A-190 (O. T. 1994); No. A-200 (O. T. 1994); No. A-203 (O. T. 1994)

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 512 U.S. 1283 (Miller v. Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Miller v. Johnson, 512 U.S. 1283 (1994).

Pincite

Opinion

Applications for stay, presented to Justice Kennedy, and by him referred to the Court, granted, and it is ordered that the judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia, Civil Action No. 194-008, dated September 12, 1994, is stayed pending the timely filing of statements as to jurisdiction [1284]*1284in this Court. Should such statements be so timely filed, this order shall remain in effect pending this Court’s action on the appeals. If the judgment should be affirmed, or the appeals dismissed, this stay shall expire automatically. In the event jurisdiction is noted, or postponed, this order shall remain in effect pending the sending down of the judgment of this Court.

Justice Scalia took no part in the consideration or decision of these applications.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Applications for stay, presented to Justice Kennedy, and by him referred to the Court, granted, and it is ordered that the judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia, Civil Action No. 194-008, dated September 12, 1994, is stayed pending the timely filing of statements as to jurisdiction [1284]*1284in this Court. Should such statements be so timely filed, this order shall remain in effect pending this Court’s action on the appeals. If the judgment should be affirmed, or the appeals dismissed, this stay shall expire automatically. In the event jurisdiction is noted, or postponed, this order shall remain in effect pending the sending down of the judgment of this Court.

Justice Scalia took no part in the consideration or decision of these applications.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

512 U.S. 1283, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miller-v-johnson-scotus-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack