Miller v. Johnson

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Miller v. Johnson

424 A.2d 548, 276 Pa. Super. 638

Superior Court of Pennsylvania·Decided December 14, 1979·No. No. 1445·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Appellant contends that chiropractic services should qualify as “medical services” for purposes of meeting the threshold requirements of section 301(a)(5)(b) of the No-fault Motor Vehicle Insurance Act, Act of July 19, 1974, P.L. 489, No. 176, Art. III, sec. 301 (40 P.S. § 1009.301). In the case of Babcock v. Tippett, 260 Pa.Super. 583, 394 A.2d 607 (1978), we held that chiropractic services do not so qualify.

Accordingly, the order of the Court of Common Pleas is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appellant contends that chiropractic services should qualify as “medical services” for purposes of meeting the threshold requirements of section 301(a)(5)(b) of the No-fault Motor Vehicle Insurance Act, Act of July 19, 1974, P.L. 489, No. 176, Art. III, sec. 301 (40 P.S. § 1009.301). In the case of Babcock v. Tippett, 260 Pa.Super. 583, 394 A.2d 607 (1978), we held that chiropractic services do not so qualify.

Accordingly, the order of the Court of Common Pleas is affirmed.

Miller v. Johnson, 424 A.2d 548, 276 Pa. Super. 638 (Pa. Ct. App. 1979).

Pincite

424 A.2d 548 (Miller v. Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related