MILLER v. JACKSON

Fourth Circuit

MILLER v. JACKSON

161 F. App'x 298

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 9, 2006·No. No. 05-7323·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Dennis Miller appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint as frivolous. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Miller v. Jackson, No. CA-05-300-MU-3 (W.D.N.C. filed July 7, 2005 & entered July 8, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Dennis Miller appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint as frivolous. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Miller v. Jackson, No. CA-05-300-MU-3 (W.D.N.C. filed July 7, 2005 & entered July 8, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

MILLER v. JACKSON, 161 F. App'x 298 (4th Cir. 2006).

Pincite

161 F. App'x 298 (MILLER v. JACKSON) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related