Miller v. Irwin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Miller v. Irwin

202 A.D.2d 344, 610 N.Y.S.2d 780

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 29, 1994

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 202 A.D.2d 344 (Miller v. Irwin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Miller v. Irwin, 202 A.D.2d 344, 610 N.Y.S.2d 780 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Alan [345]*345Saks, J.), entered May 11, 1992, which, inter alia, denied defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The testimony of plaintiffs attorney that he personally reserved the summons and complaint at a deposition satisfied plaintiffs burden of establishing proper service by a preponderance of the credible evidence (see, Powell v Powell, 114 AD2d 443). We find no reason to disturb the IAS Court’s findings crediting the testimony of plaintiffs attorney and discrediting the contrary testimony of defendant. Concur— Murphy, P. J., Sullivan, Carro, Rosenberger and Asch, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Alan [345]*345Saks, J.), entered May 11, 1992, which, inter alia, denied defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The testimony of plaintiffs attorney that he personally reserved the summons and complaint at a deposition satisfied plaintiffs burden of establishing proper service by a preponderance of the credible evidence (see, Powell v Powell, 114 AD2d 443). We find no reason to disturb the IAS Court’s findings crediting the testimony of plaintiffs attorney and discrediting the contrary testimony of defendant. Concur— Murphy, P. J., Sullivan, Carro, Rosenberger and Asch, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

202 A.D.2d 344, 610 N.Y.S.2d 780, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miller-v-irwin-nyappdiv-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack