Miller v. Interstate Trust & Banking Co.

Supreme Court of Florida

Miller v. Interstate Trust & Banking Co.

153 So. 899, 114 Fla. 284, 1934 Fla. LEXIS 1827

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided March 17, 1934·Published

Opinion

*285 Per Curiam.

— Writ of error brings for review judgment against plaintiff in error in a cause wherein he was sued upon a written contract guaranteeing payment by another of certain sums of money at certain times in accordance with the provisions, terms and conditions of a certain written contract made and executed between the parties for the construction and installation of a sprinkler system in a certain building described in the contract.

The record discloses no reversible error and judgment should be affirmed.

It is so ordered.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*285 Per Curiam.

— Writ of error brings for review judgment against plaintiff in error in a cause wherein he was sued upon a written contract guaranteeing payment by another of certain sums of money at certain times in accordance with the provisions, terms and conditions of a certain written contract made and executed between the parties for the construction and installation of a sprinkler system in a certain building described in the contract.

The record discloses no reversible error and judgment should be affirmed.

It is so ordered.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.

Miller v. Interstate Trust & Banking Co., 153 So. 899, 114 Fla. 284, 1934 Fla. LEXIS 1827 (Fla. 1934).

Pincite

153 So. 899 (Miller v. Interstate Trust & Banking Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.