Miller v. Huntington
1 How. Pr. 218
Opinion
Held, that the proof of service of subpcena, was not taxable, it being only necessary in case of the default of the witness, [219] and there being a proper charge against him ; but, that both charges for traveling fees, and the charge of twenty-five cents for notice of taxation were properly allowed by the taxing officer.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Miller v. Huntington, 1 How. Pr. 218 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1845).
1 How. Pr. 218 (Miller v. Huntington) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
O'Rourke v. Degnon Realty & Terminal Improvement Co.
139 A.D. 695 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1910)