Miller v. Huntington
1 How. Pr. 218
This text of 1 How. Pr. 218 (Miller v. Huntington) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Miller v. Huntington, 1 How. Pr. 218 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1845).
Opinion
Held, that the proof of service of subpcena, was not taxable, it being only necessary in case of the default of the witness, [219]*219and there being a proper charge against him ; but, that both charges for traveling fees, and the charge of twenty-five cents for notice of taxation were properly allowed by the taxing officer.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
O'Rourke v. Degnon Realty & Terminal Improvement Co.
139 A.D. 695 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1910)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
1 How. Pr. 218, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miller-v-huntington-nysupct-1845.