Miller v. Hubbell

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Miller v. Hubbell

143 S.E. 464, 38 Ga. App. 172, 1928 Ga. App. LEXIS 108

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedMay 15, 1928

Docket18784

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 143 S.E. 464 (Miller v. Hubbell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Miller v. Hubbell, 143 S.E. 464, 38 Ga. App. 172, 1928 Ga. App. LEXIS 108 (Ga. Ct. App. 1928).

Pincite

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

1. The demurrer to the amended petition was properly overruled.

2. The disallowance of the amendment to the answer was not error.

[173]*173Decided May 15, 1928. Martin, Martin & Snotu, for plaintiffs in error. Jones, Jones & Johnston, contra.

3. Under the facts of the case as disclosed by the record the various assignments of error upon rulings as to the admissibility of evidence are without merit, and the evidence demanded the verdict directed.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke cmd Bloodworth, JJ., eoneur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI