Miller v. Hubbell

143 S.E. 464, 38 Ga. App. 172, 1928 Ga. App. LEXIS 108
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided May 15, 1928·No. 18784·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

1. The demurrer to the amended petition was properly overruled.

2. The disallowance of the amendment to the answer was not error.

[173]*173Decided May 15, 1928. Martin, Martin & Snotu, for plaintiffs in error. Jones, Jones & Johnston, contra.

3. Under the facts of the case as disclosed by the record the various assignments of error upon rulings as to the admissibility of evidence are without merit, and the evidence demanded the verdict directed.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke cmd Bloodworth, JJ., eoneur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Miller v. Hubbell, 143 S.E. 464, 38 Ga. App. 172, 1928 Ga. App. LEXIS 108 (Ga. Ct. App. 1928).

143 S.E. 464 (Miller v. Hubbell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jenks v. Billingsley
146 S.E. 649 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1929)