Miller v. Hooe

17 F. Cas. 320, 2 D.C. 622, 2 Cranch 622
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia
DecidedNovember 15, 1825
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 17 F. Cas. 320 (Miller v. Hooe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Miller v. Hooe, 17 F. Cas. 320, 2 D.C. 622, 2 Cranch 622 (circtddc 1825).

Opinion

The Court

(Thruston, J., absent,)

was of opinion, that as the garnishee was not indebted to the defendant Hooe, and had not any effects of that defendant in his hands within the jurisdiction of this Court, no decree could be made against either of the defendants, and ordered the bill to be dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ashley v. Quintard
90 F. 84 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Ohio, 1898)
Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. Sharitt
43 Kan. 375 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1890)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
17 F. Cas. 320, 2 D.C. 622, 2 Cranch 622, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miller-v-hooe-circtddc-1825.