Miller v. Hooe

17 F. Cas. 320, 2 D.C. 622, 2 Cranch 622
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia·Decided November 15, 1825·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

The Court

(Thruston, J., absent,)

was of opinion, that as the garnishee was not indebted to the defendant Hooe, and had not any effects of that defendant in his hands within the jurisdiction of this Court, no decree could be made against either of the defendants, and ordered the bill to be dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Miller v. Hooe, 17 F. Cas. 320, 2 D.C. 622, 2 Cranch 622 (circtddc 1825).

17 F. Cas. 320 (Miller v. Hooe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ashley v. Quintard
90 F. 84 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Ohio, 1898)
Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. Sharitt
43 Kan. 375 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1890)