Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Miller v. Hillsborough County

Miller v. Hillsborough County

833 So. 2d 278, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 19229, 2002 WL 31875026
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 27, 2002
DocketNo. 2D01-5271
StatusPublished

This text of 833 So. 2d 278 (Miller v. Hillsborough County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Miller v. Hillsborough County, 833 So. 2d 278, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 19229, 2002 WL 31875026 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this appeal from a “Final Judgment as to Attorney’s Fees,” Randall O. Reder, appellate counsel for Thomas Miller, challenges the constitutionality of the Thirteenth Judicial circuit’s administrative order establishing a $60 hourly rate for court-appointed attorney’s fees. We treat the appeal as a petition for writ of certio-rari. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.040(c). We deny the petition based on Sheppard & White, P.A. v. City of Jacksonville, 827 So.2d 925 (Fla.2002).

FULMER, DAVIS, and COVINGTON, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sheppard & White, PA v. City of Jacksonville
827 So. 2d 925 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
833 So. 2d 278, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 19229, 2002 WL 31875026, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miller-v-hillsborough-county-fladistctapp-2002.