Miller v. Hillsborough County

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Miller v. Hillsborough County

833 So. 2d 278, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 19229, 2002 WL 31875026

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 27, 2002·No. No. 2D01-5271·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this appeal from a “Final Judgment as to Attorney’s Fees,” Randall O. Reder, appellate counsel for Thomas Miller, challenges the constitutionality of the Thirteenth Judicial circuit’s administrative order establishing a $60 hourly rate for court-appointed attorney’s fees. We treat the appeal as a petition for writ of certio-rari. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.040(c). We deny the petition based on Sheppard & White, P.A. v. City of Jacksonville, 827 So.2d 925 (Fla.2002).

FULMER, DAVIS, and COVINGTON, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In this appeal from a “Final Judgment as to Attorney’s Fees,” Randall O. Reder, appellate counsel for Thomas Miller, challenges the constitutionality of the Thirteenth Judicial circuit’s administrative order establishing a $60 hourly rate for court-appointed attorney’s fees. We treat the appeal as a petition for writ of certio-rari. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.040(c). We deny the petition based on Sheppard & White, P.A. v. City of Jacksonville, 827 So.2d 925 (Fla.2002).

FULMER, DAVIS, and COVINGTON, JJ., Concur.

Miller v. Hillsborough County, 833 So. 2d 278, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 19229, 2002 WL 31875026 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

833 So. 2d 278 (Miller v. Hillsborough County) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related