Miller v. Hibben

Indiana Supreme Court

Miller v. Hibben

17 Ind. 441, 1861 Ind. LEXIS 472

CourtIndiana Supreme Court

DecidedDecember 12, 1861

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 17 Ind. 441 (Miller v. Hibben) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Miller v. Hibben, 17 Ind. 441, 1861 Ind. LEXIS 472 (Ind. 1861).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

After the issues in this cause had been made up, and the evidence all heard by the jury, the Court permitted amendments to the complaint to be filed, adding to the causes of action, and leading to a reformation of the issues. To the making of these amendments the defendant objected and excepted. See 10 Ind. 199, and 227.

A. Ellison, for the appellant.

The Court caused the jury to be re-swoni to try the new issues, and then refused to hear any evidence upon them, but directed the jury to consider the evidence given on.the former, as applicable to the new issues. Hearing the evidence is a very important part of the trial of an issue. See Ind. Dig., p. 656. The Court refused, when properly requested by the defendant, to direct the jury to find specially, according to the statute. See Perk. Prac. 295.

The judgment below is reversed, with costs. Cause remanded for further proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI