Miller v. Hellam Distilling Co.
57 Pa. Super. 191, 1914 Pa. Super. LEXIS 176
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Miller v. Hellam Distilling Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 57 Pa. Super. 183 →
Opinion
Opinion by
The appeal in this case involves the same questions as decided in the appeal of E. T. Eyster, as entered to No. 7, March Term, 1914, at Harrisburg, and for the reasons given in that opinion the assignments of error are overruled and the order of the court below confirming the report of the auditor is affirmed, at the cost of the appellant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Miller v. Hellam Distilling Co., 57 Pa. Super. 191, 1914 Pa. Super. LEXIS 176 (Pa. Ct. App. 1914).
57 Pa. Super. 191 (Miller v. Hellam Distilling Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.