Miller v. Headley
163 A. 665, 112 N.J. Eq. 89, 1933 N.J. LEXIS 922
Opinion
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Fielder, and reported in 109 N. J. Eq. 436.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chiee-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Brogan, Heher, Van Buskirk, Kays, Heteield, Dear, Wells, Kerney, JJ. 16.
For reversal — Hone.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Miller v. Headley, 163 A. 665, 112 N.J. Eq. 89, 1933 N.J. LEXIS 922 (N.J. 1933).
163 A. 665 (Miller v. Headley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Bussell v. DeWalt Products Corp.
614 A.2d 622 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1992)
Biddle v. Biddle
398 A.2d 1297 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1979)
Amster v. Tenney
51 A.2d 257 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1947)
Gottlaub v. Cohen
51 A.2d 254 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1947)
Bondarchuk v. Barber
38 A.2d 872 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1944)
Palisade Gardens, Inc. v. Grosch
185 A. 27 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1936)