Miller v. Hartman
31 Misc. 785, 65 N.Y.S. 1141
This text of 31 Misc. 785 (Miller v. Hartman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Miller v. Hartman, 31 Misc. 785, 65 N.Y.S. 1141 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1900).
Opinion
There is no evidence that at the time of the making of the check the defendant did not have sufficient funds on deposit in the bank upon which it was drawn. The judgment mnst, therefore, be reversed.
Present: Beekmah, P. J., Giegebich and O’Gobmah, JJ. •
Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
31 Misc. 785, 65 N.Y.S. 1141, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miller-v-hartman-nyappterm-1900.